I remember well when about 18 years ago, I wanted to open a small theatre of my own, where close-up magic was performed evening after evening.
A few years later I was helping a fellow magician with his show and I suggested performing close-up magic at a round table, with the spectators sitting around in multiple rows, like in an ancient Greek open-air theatre. All this, of course, influenced by my own ideas and dreams I had for years.
There were reasons for it. I was always obsessed with the act of Albert Goshman. I saw quite a few pictures of him performing at a round table. Then he said many times, that he did “table-top magic theatre”. That means a complete act or show, choreographed and theatrically staged, using even music in his performance pieces, performed on a table top. People sitting right at the table and experiencing the magic right in front of their nose, being actually involved. That’s the idea. And I got sort of fixated on this. Obsessed. Albert Goshman’s way of performing was the inspiration and foundation for my ideas. He has to get all the credit, for elevating close-up table magic into a theatrical act.
The idea of the Greek theatre, of course, is a classic and historical one and suggested more spectators, which all had a good view of the performing surface (due to the ascending seats). With all that, my idea of performing a “round table magic theatre” was born and in fact, we started to build the very first round table with a diameter of about 2 meters the next day in the workshop. Covered with green felt and with fringes at the edge, it was a rough model, but it worked! We started to routine close-up pieces for this special “stage setting”.
Since then my friend elaborated greatly on this idea and made a huge success in Germany commercially. His magic lounge is the biggest and most impressive place you will find. It is an enormous enterprise. As usual in magic, when someone has success with an novel idea, this is overtaken by other in no time and so we have now in Germany quite a lot of these close-up magic theatres. Along with this comes a certain way, these theatres apparently are supposed to look like. A new trend is up and running full power …
My point gets clearer when you study the pictures. These are from three successful theatres operating in Germany and Switzerland. As you can see, these venues are structured all almost the same lines: a lounge, a bar and a round (or half-round) table, with spectators seated in Greek style, with ascending seats.
What they all have in common is that close-up tricks, which were originally intended for intimate performing settings with a maximum of 8 spectators sitting right at the table, are now performed for audiences up to 150 persons – actually more a stand-up crowd (but seated in ascending rows). Of course, sometimes video screens are used to enhance the vision for the spectators sitting farer away, making it more “close-up” and transforming close-up handmade magic into a high-tech spectacle.
Nothing against the shows and the material – the guys perform very well and present some exciting shows for the paying public. All have in common that lounge character, which a magic theatres these days apparently must have. Naturally, this is the place where the commercial side happens with the selling of drinks, snacks, finger food and whatever. All of them play full-evening shows, each about 2 hours duration (with a break). The setting, atmosphere and magical content seem to be very much alike. All are great, but none of them seems to stand out from an originality point of view for me.
So this development went far away from my original plan of an intimate table-top theatre in the style of Albert Goshman (with at most 20 or so spectators) into a full fletched stand-up show, which is bears the deceptive and alluring title “close-up magic” or “table theatre magic”. We still have a similar situation at our magic conventions (at least at most of them, there are exceptions, of course), where close-up shows are still put into unfavorably settings, being performed for audiences of sometimes a few hundreds.
The same holds true for the majority of close-up competitions. Is this a good trend? I am not sure. Surely the theatre operators do their absolutely best trying to create a professional setting for close-up. Whether this is the proper setting indeed, is doubtful. There is nothing wrong with magic theatres, but then if the setting is like that shown in the current theatres, then a lot more stand-up routines would have to be shown. To call this “close-up magic” or “magic performed up close” is no longer the truth.
But what really looks disturbing to me is, that all these theatres look very much the same. The structure, the setting and the concept. I have quite a lot of completely different looking theatre concepts for magic in my mind (and on the construction paper). Something that is really new and fresh, and has a distinct and different look and feel. It is a pity as well, that the tricks shown are more or less standard: Chop Cups, endless card routines (Ambitious Card, Oil and Water, folded cards to anywhere, color changes, and on), the usual coin stuff (3‑fly, CTT, coins across), rope stuff, cups and balls and tons of “mentalism”. More originality and variety in selection and construction of the magic material would really be appreciated. otherwise it seems like ‘Have you seen one, then you have seen them all.’ And – if performing for so many people, the material has to be brought up into the art of stand-up presentation – means going from horizontal to vertical. A matrix on the table-top is no fun to watch from the 7th row …
My opinion on this of this kind of theatre (close-up tricks for a stand-up audience) changed. Personally, I think it is wrong. I was wrong then in the past. I learned and I corrected my wrong thinking paths. Today I think completely different about how real close-up magic has to (or should be) performed. my initial idea years ago is a one-way-street.
If I were to open such a thing these days, I wouldn’t go for that plain theatre style. I have quite a few interesting ideas for other venue formats, which do not kill the original idea of true close-up and are much more exciting. Ideas that go beyond that trend and that are much more suitable for the audience to experience real close-up. So far, nobody is interested in my ideas. And why should they? The currents systems seem to work.
As everybody knows: Never change a running system. It is easier to follow a working path. Really? Why not dare to go into another direction?